Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC rejected the petitioner's application for bail in a GST fraud case involving alleged creation of fictitious firms and issuance of fake invoices to pass on bogus ITC without actual supply of goods or services, constituting cognizable and non-bailable offences under s.132(1) and 132(5) of the CGST Act. On a prima facie evaluation, HC held the petitioner was not an innocent service provider but an active participant in an organized interstate gang, receiving illegal remuneration. Given the gravity of the offence, ongoing and wide-ranging investigation, and potential impact of release on effective investigation, HC found no ground to exercise discretion in favour of bail and dismissed the bail petition.
HC rejected the petitioner's application for bail in a GST fraud case involving alleged creation of fictitious firms and issuance of fake invoices to pass on bogus ITC without actual supply of goods or services, constituting cognizable and non-bailable offences under s.132(1) and 132(5) of the CGST Act. On a prima facie evaluation, HC held the petitioner was not an innocent service provider but an active participant in an organized interstate gang, receiving illegal remuneration. Given the gravity of the offence, ongoing and wide-ranging investigation, and potential impact of release on effective investigation, HC found no ground to exercise discretion in favour of bail and dismissed the bail petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
