Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the SCN issued by Central GST authorities. It held that the applicability of Section 6 of the CGST Act, the interplay between State and Central proceedings, the effect of earlier State GST orders (including audit orders), and the petitioner's precise status as a "government authority" are all contentious factual and legal issues requiring adjudication by the competent authority. The SCN could not be termed "wholly without jurisdiction" at the threshold. Relying on the SC's jurisprudence on alternative remedies, the HC declined to exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and left all contentions open to be urged before the adjudicating authority.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the SCN issued by Central GST authorities. It held that the applicability of Section 6 of the CGST Act, the interplay between State and Central proceedings, the effect of earlier State GST orders (including audit orders), and the petitioner's precise status as a "government authority" are all contentious factual and legal issues requiring adjudication by the competent authority. The SCN could not be termed "wholly without jurisdiction" at the threshold. Relying on the SC's jurisprudence on alternative remedies, the HC declined to exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and left all contentions open to be urged before the adjudicating authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
