Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee-bank's claim for deduction of amortization of premium paid on purchase of government securities held under the HTM category. It held that the assessee, engaged in banking business under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, is statutorily required to invest in government securities to maintain SLR and capital adequacy norms prescribed by RBI. The Tribunal treated the premium amortized over the period to maturity as revenue expenditure, following its earlier precedent, and held that such amortization is an allowable deduction in computing taxable income. The Revenue's objections were consequently rejected.
ITAT allowed the assessee-bank's claim for deduction of amortization of premium paid on purchase of government securities held under the HTM category. It held that the assessee, engaged in banking business under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, is statutorily required to invest in government securities to maintain SLR and capital adequacy norms prescribed by RBI. The Tribunal treated the premium amortized over the period to maturity as revenue expenditure, following its earlier precedent, and held that such amortization is an allowable deduction in computing taxable income. The Revenue's objections were consequently rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.