Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7361 to 7380 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee-bank's claim for deduction of amortization of premium paid on purchase of government securities held under the HTM category. It held that the assessee, engaged in banking business under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, is statutorily required to invest in government securities to maintain SLR and capital adequacy norms prescribed by RBI. The Tribunal treated the premium amortized over the period to maturity as revenue expenditure, following its earlier precedent, and held that such amortization is an allowable deduction in computing taxable income. The Revenue's objections were consequently rejected.
ITAT allowed the assessee-bank's claim for deduction of amortization of premium paid on purchase of government securities held under the HTM category. It held that the assessee, engaged in banking business under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, is statutorily required to invest in government securities to maintain SLR and capital adequacy norms prescribed by RBI. The Tribunal treated the premium amortized over the period to maturity as revenue expenditure, following its earlier precedent, and held that such amortization is an allowable deduction in computing taxable income. The Revenue's objections were consequently rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.