Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on transfer pricing, holding that for the international transaction of import of finished goods from its AE, the assessee functions as a routine distributor with no value addition, assuming limited risks, while the AE is the principal undertaking manufacturing, HQ and marketing functions and major risks. Accordingly, the assessee was rightly treated as the tested party and Resale Price Method (RPM), with PLI of gross profit to sales, was held to be the Most Appropriate Method instead of TNMM. The TP adjustment made by the TPO/AO was thereby held unsustainable.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on transfer pricing, holding that for the international transaction of import of finished goods from its AE, the assessee functions as a routine distributor with no value addition, assuming limited risks, while the AE is the principal undertaking manufacturing, HQ and marketing functions and major risks. Accordingly, the assessee was rightly treated as the tested party and Resale Price Method (RPM), with PLI of gross profit to sales, was held to be the Most Appropriate Method instead of TNMM. The TP adjustment made by the TPO/AO was thereby held unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.