Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7361 to 7380 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that, in terms of Notification No. 05/2022 dated 29-07-2022, the date of dispatch of the duly signed ITR-V by Speed Post is the relevant date for determining the 30-day e-verification period from electronic transmission of the return. The assessee dispatched ITR-V on 21-08-2023, which falls within 30 days from 24-07-2023, rendering the return deemed to be filed within the due date under s.139(1). Accordingly, ITAT directed CPC to allow the assessee's option for the new tax regime. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT held that, in terms of Notification No. 05/2022 dated 29-07-2022, the date of dispatch of the duly signed ITR-V by Speed Post is the relevant date for determining the 30-day e-verification period from electronic transmission of the return. The assessee dispatched ITR-V on 21-08-2023, which falls within 30 days from 24-07-2023, rendering the return deemed to be filed within the due date under s.139(1). Accordingly, ITAT directed CPC to allow the assessee's option for the new tax regime. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
