Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the reassessment proceedings. It held that for AY 2013-14, the statutory time limit for issuing notice u/s 148 expired on 31.03.2020, whereas the AO issued notice on 16.04.2021, rendering it time-barred and invalid. Further, sanction for issuance of notice was obtained from the PCIT instead of the competent authority, the PCCIT, vitiating the proceedings. The Tribunal held that such foundational defects in jurisdiction and sanction are not curable u/s 292BB, and consequently the reassessment was invalid.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the reassessment proceedings. It held that for AY 2013-14, the statutory time limit for issuing notice u/s 148 expired on 31.03.2020, whereas the AO issued notice on 16.04.2021, rendering it time-barred and invalid. Further, sanction for issuance of notice was obtained from the PCIT instead of the competent authority, the PCCIT, vitiating the proceedings. The Tribunal held that such foundational defects in jurisdiction and sanction are not curable u/s 292BB, and consequently the reassessment was invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.