Money laundering property attachment and third-party encumbrance rights clarified; prior bona fide interests enforceable before confiscation, appeals ...
Profiteering in construction services for failure to pass input tax credit resulted in repayment exceeding the commensurate benefit and closure of pro...
ITAT held that penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) was leviable only for non-compliance with the main notice u/s 142(1), as the subsequent two communications were mere reminder notices and not independent statutory notices. Since the assessment was framed u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B for AY 2022-23, indicating non-compliance with the primary notice, penalty of Rs. 10,000/- for that default was sustained. However, penalty of Rs. 20,000/- imposed for non-compliance with the two reminder notices was deleted. The assessee's appeal was thus partly allowed, restricting the penalty to Rs. 10,000/-.
ITAT held that penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) was leviable only for non-compliance with the main notice u/s 142(1), as the subsequent two communications were mere reminder notices and not independent statutory notices. Since the assessment was framed u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B for AY 2022-23, indicating non-compliance with the primary notice, penalty of Rs. 10,000/- for that default was sustained. However, penalty of Rs. 20,000/- imposed for non-compliance with the two reminder notices was deleted. The assessee's appeal was thus partly allowed, restricting the penalty to Rs. 10,000/-.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.