Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that payment by the company for purchase of a motor car registered in the name of the assessee, a substantial shareholder, does not automatically constitute deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e). Being a deeming provision, s. 2(22)(e) requires that the payment confer a contemporaneous individual and personal benefit on the shareholder. On facts, the car was used for the company's business and there was no material to show personal or family use by the shareholder. Mere registration of the vehicle in the shareholder's name was held insufficient to establish personal benefit. Consequently, the addition made as deemed dividend was deleted and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT held that payment by the company for purchase of a motor car registered in the name of the assessee, a substantial shareholder, does not automatically constitute deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e). Being a deeming provision, s. 2(22)(e) requires that the payment confer a contemporaneous individual and personal benefit on the shareholder. On facts, the car was used for the company's business and there was no material to show personal or family use by the shareholder. Mere registration of the vehicle in the shareholder's name was held insufficient to establish personal benefit. Consequently, the addition made as deemed dividend was deleted and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.