Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT allowed the liquidator's appeal and set aside the impugned order that had interfered with cancellation of sale and forfeiture of EMD. The Tribunal held that the auction purchaser, declared H1, committed clear default by failing to adhere to strict payment timelines stipulated in the E-Auction Process Document, despite having opportunity and no legal restraint on compliance. The liquidator's cancellation of sale and forfeiture of EMD were held to be legitimate exercises of contractual and statutory powers under the IBC framework, and Section 74 of the Contract Act was held inapplicable. The appeal was accordingly allowed, upholding the forfeiture.
NCLAT allowed the liquidator's appeal and set aside the impugned order that had interfered with cancellation of sale and forfeiture of EMD. The Tribunal held that the auction purchaser, declared H1, committed clear default by failing to adhere to strict payment timelines stipulated in the E-Auction Process Document, despite having opportunity and no legal restraint on compliance. The liquidator's cancellation of sale and forfeiture of EMD were held to be legitimate exercises of contractual and statutory powers under the IBC framework, and Section 74 of the Contract Act was held inapplicable. The appeal was accordingly allowed, upholding the forfeiture.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
