Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that retrospective cancellation of petitioner's GST registration was unsustainable as the SCN did not propose cancellation with retrospective effect and lacked reasons justifying such retroactivity. Relying on settled law requiring clear notice and cogent reasons for retrospective cancellation, the Court found the cancellation order dated 17.08.2023 legally untenable. Consequently, the impugned appellate order dated 11.03.2025, which had dismissed petitioner's appeal as time-barred, was also set aside. The petitioner's GST registration was directed to be restored, and the writ petition was disposed of in these terms.
HC held that retrospective cancellation of petitioner's GST registration was unsustainable as the SCN did not propose cancellation with retrospective effect and lacked reasons justifying such retroactivity. Relying on settled law requiring clear notice and cogent reasons for retrospective cancellation, the Court found the cancellation order dated 17.08.2023 legally untenable. Consequently, the impugned appellate order dated 11.03.2025, which had dismissed petitioner's appeal as time-barred, was also set aside. The petitioner's GST registration was directed to be restored, and the writ petition was disposed of in these terms.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
