Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
HC quashed the reassessment notice issued to the petitioner under s.148 for AY 2019-20, holding the proceedings to be impermissible as a mere "change of opinion." The AO had already, on identical material arising from the same search, seizure and survey operation, accepted the version of both the petitioner and the transporter in the transporter's reassessment for AY 2019-20, namely, that no cash was returned to the petitioner against transportation bills. Initiating reassessment of the petitioner on the same transactions and information would amount to an impermissible review of the earlier decision. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and notice were set aside.
HC quashed the reassessment notice issued to the petitioner under s.148 for AY 2019-20, holding the proceedings to be impermissible as a mere "change of opinion." The AO had already, on identical material arising from the same search, seizure and survey operation, accepted the version of both the petitioner and the transporter in the transporter's reassessment for AY 2019-20, namely, that no cash was returned to the petitioner against transportation bills. Initiating reassessment of the petitioner on the same transactions and information would amount to an impermissible review of the earlier decision. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and notice were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.