Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that CSR payments, though disallowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), may still qualify for deduction u/s 80G when computing total taxable income, subject to statutory conditions, and that denying such deduction would amount to impermissible double disallowance. The issue of quantum and eligibility u/s 80G was remanded to AO for verification. On short-term capital loss from building, ITAT held that allowability depends on whether the sold asset was the sole asset in the relevant block u/s 50, and remanded the matter to AO for factual verification. Deletion by CIT(A) of addition for alleged excess 24KT gold stock was upheld, and Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
ITAT held that CSR payments, though disallowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), may still qualify for deduction u/s 80G when computing total taxable income, subject to statutory conditions, and that denying such deduction would amount to impermissible double disallowance. The issue of quantum and eligibility u/s 80G was remanded to AO for verification. On short-term capital loss from building, ITAT held that allowability depends on whether the sold asset was the sole asset in the relevant block u/s 50, and remanded the matter to AO for factual verification. Deletion by CIT(A) of addition for alleged excess 24KT gold stock was upheld, and Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.