Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Revenue's appeal before ITAT was dismissed. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s acceptance of additional evidence under Rule 46A, noting that the material was remanded to the AO and no remand report was furnished despite repeated reminders; thus there was no violation of Rule 46A. On merits, ITAT sustained CIT(A)'s deletion of additions relating to discrepancies in sales turnover, trade payables, and current liabilities, finding that reconciliations, third-party confirmations under s.133(6), and supporting records fully justified the assessee's position. ITAT also affirmed deletion of addition towards exceptional charges/expenses, holding that the assessee had already made a suo motu disallowance under s.37 and any further disallowance would result in double addition.
Revenue's appeal before ITAT was dismissed. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s acceptance of additional evidence under Rule 46A, noting that the material was remanded to the AO and no remand report was furnished despite repeated reminders; thus there was no violation of Rule 46A. On merits, ITAT sustained CIT(A)'s deletion of additions relating to discrepancies in sales turnover, trade payables, and current liabilities, finding that reconciliations, third-party confirmations under s.133(6), and supporting records fully justified the assessee's position. ITAT also affirmed deletion of addition towards exceptional charges/expenses, holding that the assessee had already made a suo motu disallowance under s.37 and any further disallowance would result in double addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.