Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal in part. It held that reimbursement of foreign exchange fluctuation loss on repayment of external commercial borrowing, received in monetary form from an associated enterprise, is not taxable as business income under s.28(iv), following SC precedent that the provision applies only to non-monetary benefits/perquisites. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 4,88,50,000 was directed to be deleted. On disallowance under s.40(a)(iii) relating to payments to an Indonesian entity under a secondment arrangement, ITAT remanded the matter to AO for fresh examination of agreements, invoices, employee relationships and taxability in India. ITAT also deleted addition of Rs. 9,41,162 reversed provision, as corresponding expenditure had already been disallowed.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal in part. It held that reimbursement of foreign exchange fluctuation loss on repayment of external commercial borrowing, received in monetary form from an associated enterprise, is not taxable as business income under s.28(iv), following SC precedent that the provision applies only to non-monetary benefits/perquisites. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 4,88,50,000 was directed to be deleted. On disallowance under s.40(a)(iii) relating to payments to an Indonesian entity under a secondment arrangement, ITAT remanded the matter to AO for fresh examination of agreements, invoices, employee relationships and taxability in India. ITAT also deleted addition of Rs. 9,41,162 reversed provision, as corresponding expenditure had already been disallowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.