Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appeal by assessee was partly allowed. ITAT held that separate TP benchmarking for royalty was unwarranted when TNMM was accepted for other international transactions; assessee's TNMM-based ALP for royalty was upheld. Exemption u/s 10AA and deduction u/s 80JJAA, disallowed by CPC for a return filed a few hours late due to portal glitches, were sustained as valid, the due-date condition not being applicable for A.Y. 2018-19. Disallowance u/s 14A as made by AO was upheld, but ITAT directed that such disallowance not be added while computing book profits u/s 115JB. Deduction u/s 35(2AB), correction of double taxation of LTCG, and recomputation of interest u/s 234C were remitted to AO/JAO for verification and fresh computation.
Appeal by assessee was partly allowed. ITAT held that separate TP benchmarking for royalty was unwarranted when TNMM was accepted for other international transactions; assessee's TNMM-based ALP for royalty was upheld. Exemption u/s 10AA and deduction u/s 80JJAA, disallowed by CPC for a return filed a few hours late due to portal glitches, were sustained as valid, the due-date condition not being applicable for A.Y. 2018-19. Disallowance u/s 14A as made by AO was upheld, but ITAT directed that such disallowance not be added while computing book profits u/s 115JB. Deduction u/s 35(2AB), correction of double taxation of LTCG, and recomputation of interest u/s 234C were remitted to AO/JAO for verification and fresh computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.