Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the individual assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. It held the approval u/s 153D invalid as the JCIT granted omnibus approval for 98 cases on the same day and from a distant station, rendering the assessment order void ab initio. On merits, ITAT accepted that unexplained cash found during search belonged to group companies, as it matched their cash books, and treated the assessee's prior surrender as made under pressure without corroborative evidence. It upheld CIT(A)'s view that assessment should have been initiated u/s 153C, not u/s 143(3). Additions towards jewellery were deleted considering CBDT circular, assessee's high net worth and disclosed income. ITAT also rejected additions based on uncertified electronic data lacking s.65B compliance.
ITAT allowed the individual assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. It held the approval u/s 153D invalid as the JCIT granted omnibus approval for 98 cases on the same day and from a distant station, rendering the assessment order void ab initio. On merits, ITAT accepted that unexplained cash found during search belonged to group companies, as it matched their cash books, and treated the assessee's prior surrender as made under pressure without corroborative evidence. It upheld CIT(A)'s view that assessment should have been initiated u/s 153C, not u/s 143(3). Additions towards jewellery were deleted considering CBDT circular, assessee's high net worth and disclosed income. ITAT also rejected additions based on uncertified electronic data lacking s.65B compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.