Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the revisionary order u/s 263 passed by the PCIT. It held that the computation sheet forming part of the assessment order correctly reflected the net LTCG after reducing the LTCG already disclosed in the return, and that only the narrative portion of the assessment order contained an incorrect gross LTCG figure. As there was no error in the actual computation to render the assessment order erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue, the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263 was held invalid.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the revisionary order u/s 263 passed by the PCIT. It held that the computation sheet forming part of the assessment order correctly reflected the net LTCG after reducing the LTCG already disclosed in the return, and that only the narrative portion of the assessment order contained an incorrect gross LTCG figure. As there was no error in the actual computation to render the assessment order erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue, the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263 was held invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.