Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC examined the blocking of petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under Rule 86A of the GST Rules, 2017. It held that Rule 86A permits only temporary restriction on debiting input tax credit (ITC) where there is reason to believe the ITC is fraudulently availed or ineligible, and does not contemplate "negative blocking" beyond the credit actually available in the ECL. The Court endorsed earlier views of other HCs that no prior show cause notice is required for such emergent action, but clarified that excess blocking is impermissible. Issues of wrongful availment/utilisation of ITC must be adjudicated under Sections 73/74. Petition allowed.
HC examined the blocking of petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under Rule 86A of the GST Rules, 2017. It held that Rule 86A permits only temporary restriction on debiting input tax credit (ITC) where there is reason to believe the ITC is fraudulently availed or ineligible, and does not contemplate "negative blocking" beyond the credit actually available in the ECL. The Court endorsed earlier views of other HCs that no prior show cause notice is required for such emergent action, but clarified that excess blocking is impermissible. Issues of wrongful availment/utilisation of ITC must be adjudicated under Sections 73/74. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
