Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that services supplied by petitioner to a foreign entity constitute "export of services" under Section 2(6) IGST Act, as consideration was received in convertible foreign exchange and supplier and recipient are separate legal entities, not mere establishments of distinct persons. Applying the principle of substance over form, the Court held that the nature of services and contractual terms do not make petitioner an "intermediary" and the place of supply is outside India under Section 13(2) IGST Act. Notification No. 04/2019-Integrated Tax was found inapplicable, being confined to pharmaceutical R&D, unlike petitioner's activities. The refund rejection order and show cause notices were quashed, and petitioner's claim for refund of unutilized ITC was allowed.
HC held that services supplied by petitioner to a foreign entity constitute "export of services" under Section 2(6) IGST Act, as consideration was received in convertible foreign exchange and supplier and recipient are separate legal entities, not mere establishments of distinct persons. Applying the principle of substance over form, the Court held that the nature of services and contractual terms do not make petitioner an "intermediary" and the place of supply is outside India under Section 13(2) IGST Act. Notification No. 04/2019-Integrated Tax was found inapplicable, being confined to pharmaceutical R&D, unlike petitioner's activities. The refund rejection order and show cause notices were quashed, and petitioner's claim for refund of unutilized ITC was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.