Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that execution of the JDA did not constitute a "transfer" under section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, as no consideration, monetary or otherwise, was received or accrued to the assessee during the year of execution, and possession was given only for the limited purpose of development. Relying on the Telangana HC decision in Smt. Shantha Vidyasagar Annam, the Tribunal ruled that the statutory conditions for invoking section 45(1) were not satisfied in the relevant assessment year. Consequently, no LTCG was chargeable, and the addition made on account of alleged long-term capital gains was deleted, deciding the appeal in favour of the assessee.
ITAT held that execution of the JDA did not constitute a "transfer" under section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, as no consideration, monetary or otherwise, was received or accrued to the assessee during the year of execution, and possession was given only for the limited purpose of development. Relying on the Telangana HC decision in Smt. Shantha Vidyasagar Annam, the Tribunal ruled that the statutory conditions for invoking section 45(1) were not satisfied in the relevant assessment year. Consequently, no LTCG was chargeable, and the addition made on account of alleged long-term capital gains was deleted, deciding the appeal in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
