Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the denial of exemption u/s 11 and 12 made in intimation u/s 143(1)(a) and confirmed by CIT(A). It held that the assessee had a valid and subsisting registration u/s 12A during the relevant previous year and that subsequent registration u/s 12AB, granted from AY 2022-23, did not extinguish or interrupt the earlier registration. The Tribunal held that the transition from sections 12A/12AA to 12AB is non-disruptive and the proviso to section 12A(2) protects exemption during the intervening period. Mere non-filling of the new registration number in the ITR could not justify denial of exemption.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the denial of exemption u/s 11 and 12 made in intimation u/s 143(1)(a) and confirmed by CIT(A). It held that the assessee had a valid and subsisting registration u/s 12A during the relevant previous year and that subsequent registration u/s 12AB, granted from AY 2022-23, did not extinguish or interrupt the earlier registration. The Tribunal held that the transition from sections 12A/12AA to 12AB is non-disruptive and the proviso to section 12A(2) protects exemption during the intervening period. Mere non-filling of the new registration number in the ITR could not justify denial of exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.