Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7361 to 7380 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the denial of exemption u/s 11 and 12 made in intimation u/s 143(1)(a) and confirmed by CIT(A). It held that the assessee had a valid and subsisting registration u/s 12A during the relevant previous year and that subsequent registration u/s 12AB, granted from AY 2022-23, did not extinguish or interrupt the earlier registration. The Tribunal held that the transition from sections 12A/12AA to 12AB is non-disruptive and the proviso to section 12A(2) protects exemption during the intervening period. Mere non-filling of the new registration number in the ITR could not justify denial of exemption.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the denial of exemption u/s 11 and 12 made in intimation u/s 143(1)(a) and confirmed by CIT(A). It held that the assessee had a valid and subsisting registration u/s 12A during the relevant previous year and that subsequent registration u/s 12AB, granted from AY 2022-23, did not extinguish or interrupt the earlier registration. The Tribunal held that the transition from sections 12A/12AA to 12AB is non-disruptive and the proviso to section 12A(2) protects exemption during the intervening period. Mere non-filling of the new registration number in the ITR could not justify denial of exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
