Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld deletion of addition made u/s 69C towards alleged unexplained expenditure on construction of a plant in Mewat, Haryana. It held that the assessee had not commenced business and had generated no revenue, making it improbable that such expenditure was incurred from undisclosed income. The loose papers and WhatsApp chats relied upon by the AO were uncorroborated, with figures not matching any identified party, and no valuation or independent verification was undertaken. ITAT noted that assessment of a related entity was completed without adverse inference. In absence of cogent evidence linking the expenditure to the assessee, the addition was unsustainable.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld deletion of addition made u/s 69C towards alleged unexplained expenditure on construction of a plant in Mewat, Haryana. It held that the assessee had not commenced business and had generated no revenue, making it improbable that such expenditure was incurred from undisclosed income. The loose papers and WhatsApp chats relied upon by the AO were uncorroborated, with figures not matching any identified party, and no valuation or independent verification was undertaken. ITAT noted that assessment of a related entity was completed without adverse inference. In absence of cogent evidence linking the expenditure to the assessee, the addition was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.