Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9441 to 9460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC held that the appellant's offer to deposit the amount claimed in the winding-up proceedings did not constitute an unconditional admission of liability but was made to demonstrate bona fides and secure a hearing on merits. The HC erred in disposing of the statutory appeal solely on the basis of this deposit order without adjudicating the dispute substantively. SC modified the HC order dated 06.11.2017, treating it as an interim order permitting deposit, deleted the direction that the appeal stood disposed of, and restored the company appeal to the HC file for decision under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. The deposited amount will abide the final outcome.
SC held that the appellant's offer to deposit the amount claimed in the winding-up proceedings did not constitute an unconditional admission of liability but was made to demonstrate bona fides and secure a hearing on merits. The HC erred in disposing of the statutory appeal solely on the basis of this deposit order without adjudicating the dispute substantively. SC modified the HC order dated 06.11.2017, treating it as an interim order permitting deposit, deleted the direction that the appeal stood disposed of, and restored the company appeal to the HC file for decision under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. The deposited amount will abide the final outcome.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.