Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B. The AO had reopened the assessment solely on the belief that income had escaped assessment by non-application of s.50C (capital gains on transfer of land/building). However, in the reassessment, no addition was made under s.50C; instead, the AO invoked s.43CA (business income on transfer of land/building held as stock-in-trade), which was never part of the recorded reasons. Holding this change impermissible, ITAT declared the reassessment invalid and set it aside.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B. The AO had reopened the assessment solely on the belief that income had escaped assessment by non-application of s.50C (capital gains on transfer of land/building). However, in the reassessment, no addition was made under s.50C; instead, the AO invoked s.43CA (business income on transfer of land/building held as stock-in-trade), which was never part of the recorded reasons. Holding this change impermissible, ITAT declared the reassessment invalid and set it aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.