Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7381 to 7400 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel erred in applying the Finance Act 2021 amendment to s.32(1) retrospectively. The issue of depreciation on goodwill/intangible assets acquired under slump sale was remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication after considering additional evidence, without any finding on merits. On addition under s.28(iv) for free-of-cost assets, AO was directed to delete the addition to the extent the assessee-company proves that such assets were re-exported or destroyed as per owners' instructions, after verification. Disallowance under s.40(a)(i) for alleged TDS defaults under ss.194C and 194I was also remanded to AO for fresh decision after examining lower deduction certificates.
ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel erred in applying the Finance Act 2021 amendment to s.32(1) retrospectively. The issue of depreciation on goodwill/intangible assets acquired under slump sale was remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication after considering additional evidence, without any finding on merits. On addition under s.28(iv) for free-of-cost assets, AO was directed to delete the addition to the extent the assessee-company proves that such assets were re-exported or destroyed as per owners' instructions, after verification. Disallowance under s.40(a)(i) for alleged TDS defaults under ss.194C and 194I was also remanded to AO for fresh decision after examining lower deduction certificates.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.