Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeals and partly allowed assessee's appeal. It upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions treated as business receipts from a joint development agreement, holding that, in absence of valid seized material in search assessments under s.143(3) r.w.s. 153D, sworn statements alone could not sustain additions and that receipts were taxable in the year of execution of sale deeds, not on receipt of advances. ITAT further held that disallowance for non-capitalization of interest was unjustified where borrowings and interest were genuine, business-related, and undisputed, and where the AO's approach only caused a timing distortion without corresponding adjustment in later years. The interest disallowance of Rs.3.08 crores was deleted.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeals and partly allowed assessee's appeal. It upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions treated as business receipts from a joint development agreement, holding that, in absence of valid seized material in search assessments under s.143(3) r.w.s. 153D, sworn statements alone could not sustain additions and that receipts were taxable in the year of execution of sale deeds, not on receipt of advances. ITAT further held that disallowance for non-capitalization of interest was unjustified where borrowings and interest were genuine, business-related, and undisputed, and where the AO's approach only caused a timing distortion without corresponding adjustment in later years. The interest disallowance of Rs.3.08 crores was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.