Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeals and partly allowed assessee's appeal. It upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions treated as business receipts from a joint development agreement, holding that, in absence of valid seized material in search assessments under s.143(3) r.w.s. 153D, sworn statements alone could not sustain additions and that receipts were taxable in the year of execution of sale deeds, not on receipt of advances. ITAT further held that disallowance for non-capitalization of interest was unjustified where borrowings and interest were genuine, business-related, and undisputed, and where the AO's approach only caused a timing distortion without corresponding adjustment in later years. The interest disallowance of Rs.3.08 crores was deleted.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeals and partly allowed assessee's appeal. It upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions treated as business receipts from a joint development agreement, holding that, in absence of valid seized material in search assessments under s.143(3) r.w.s. 153D, sworn statements alone could not sustain additions and that receipts were taxable in the year of execution of sale deeds, not on receipt of advances. ITAT further held that disallowance for non-capitalization of interest was unjustified where borrowings and interest were genuine, business-related, and undisputed, and where the AO's approach only caused a timing distortion without corresponding adjustment in later years. The interest disallowance of Rs.3.08 crores was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.