Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on account of alleged bogus unsecured loan. The CIT(A), after conducting independent inquiries, found that the lender company possessed adequate creditworthiness and that the transaction was genuine, thus satisfying the conditions of s.68. The Revenue failed to rebut these factual findings or produce contrary material. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s conclusion that the loan of INR 25 lakhs could not be treated as unexplained cash credit. Consequently, the corresponding disallowance of interest on such loan was also set aside and allowed as deductible business expenditure.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on account of alleged bogus unsecured loan. The CIT(A), after conducting independent inquiries, found that the lender company possessed adequate creditworthiness and that the transaction was genuine, thus satisfying the conditions of s.68. The Revenue failed to rebut these factual findings or produce contrary material. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s conclusion that the loan of INR 25 lakhs could not be treated as unexplained cash credit. Consequently, the corresponding disallowance of interest on such loan was also set aside and allowed as deductible business expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
