Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on account of alleged bogus unsecured loan. The CIT(A), after conducting independent inquiries, found that the lender company possessed adequate creditworthiness and that the transaction was genuine, thus satisfying the conditions of s.68. The Revenue failed to rebut these factual findings or produce contrary material. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s conclusion that the loan of INR 25 lakhs could not be treated as unexplained cash credit. Consequently, the corresponding disallowance of interest on such loan was also set aside and allowed as deductible business expenditure.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on account of alleged bogus unsecured loan. The CIT(A), after conducting independent inquiries, found that the lender company possessed adequate creditworthiness and that the transaction was genuine, thus satisfying the conditions of s.68. The Revenue failed to rebut these factual findings or produce contrary material. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s conclusion that the loan of INR 25 lakhs could not be treated as unexplained cash credit. Consequently, the corresponding disallowance of interest on such loan was also set aside and allowed as deductible business expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.