Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the revisional order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT. It held that the PCIT's action was prompted solely by an audit objection, which cannot by itself render the AO's order erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. The AO had followed binding SC precedent on the taxability of interest received u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, and the issue was at best debatable, with two possible views. In such circumstances, revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 could not be validly invoked. Consequently, the original assessment order of the AO was restored.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the revisional order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT. It held that the PCIT's action was prompted solely by an audit objection, which cannot by itself render the AO's order erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. The AO had followed binding SC precedent on the taxability of interest received u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, and the issue was at best debatable, with two possible views. In such circumstances, revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 could not be validly invoked. Consequently, the original assessment order of the AO was restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.