Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
AAR held that the applicant, operating as a Goods Transport Agency, is entitled to avail full ITC of GST paid on bio-diesel used as fuel in its goods carriages, as the input is used in the course or furtherance of business under Section 16 of CGST Act. Section 17(5) restrictions were found inapplicable since they relate to passenger vehicles, not goods carriages. AAR further held that the applicant may opt to pay GST on GTA services at 12% (18% w.e.f. 22.09.2025) under forward charge in terms of N/N. 11/2017-CT(R), read with N/N. 13/2017-CT(R), and correspondingly claim full ITC, subject to statutory conditions.
AAR held that the applicant, operating as a Goods Transport Agency, is entitled to avail full ITC of GST paid on bio-diesel used as fuel in its goods carriages, as the input is used in the course or furtherance of business under Section 16 of CGST Act. Section 17(5) restrictions were found inapplicable since they relate to passenger vehicles, not goods carriages. AAR further held that the applicant may opt to pay GST on GTA services at 12% (18% w.e.f. 22.09.2025) under forward charge in terms of N/N. 11/2017-CT(R), read with N/N. 13/2017-CT(R), and correspondingly claim full ITC, subject to statutory conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
