Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
AAR held that the applicant, operating as a Goods Transport Agency, is entitled to avail full ITC of GST paid on bio-diesel used as fuel in its goods carriages, as the input is used in the course or furtherance of business under Section 16 of CGST Act. Section 17(5) restrictions were found inapplicable since they relate to passenger vehicles, not goods carriages. AAR further held that the applicant may opt to pay GST on GTA services at 12% (18% w.e.f. 22.09.2025) under forward charge in terms of N/N. 11/2017-CT(R), read with N/N. 13/2017-CT(R), and correspondingly claim full ITC, subject to statutory conditions.
AAR held that the applicant, operating as a Goods Transport Agency, is entitled to avail full ITC of GST paid on bio-diesel used as fuel in its goods carriages, as the input is used in the course or furtherance of business under Section 16 of CGST Act. Section 17(5) restrictions were found inapplicable since they relate to passenger vehicles, not goods carriages. AAR further held that the applicant may opt to pay GST on GTA services at 12% (18% w.e.f. 22.09.2025) under forward charge in terms of N/N. 11/2017-CT(R), read with N/N. 13/2017-CT(R), and correspondingly claim full ITC, subject to statutory conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
