Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee-LLP's appeal, holding that undisclosed cash sales detected during survey u/s 133A, being proceeds from sale of flats, were inherently business receipts, not unexplained cash credits u/s 68. As the income arose from regular business activity accepted by the lower authorities, it was liable to be assessed as business income irrespective of its omission from turnover or expenses in the profit and loss account. Since there was no corresponding cash credit in the books, s.68 was inapplicable. The Tribunal also noted that, given identical tax rates for LLP business income and income u/s 115BBE, the entire exercise was tax neutral.
ITAT allowed the assessee-LLP's appeal, holding that undisclosed cash sales detected during survey u/s 133A, being proceeds from sale of flats, were inherently business receipts, not unexplained cash credits u/s 68. As the income arose from regular business activity accepted by the lower authorities, it was liable to be assessed as business income irrespective of its omission from turnover or expenses in the profit and loss account. Since there was no corresponding cash credit in the books, s.68 was inapplicable. The Tribunal also noted that, given identical tax rates for LLP business income and income u/s 115BBE, the entire exercise was tax neutral.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.