Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that CIT(A) erred in invoking section 249(4)(b) to dismiss the assessee's appeals in limine on the ground of non-payment of advance tax computed on assessed income, including disputed additions. Relying on precedent, ITAT ruled that advance tax liability must be determined under sections 208 and 209 on admitted or undisputed income, not on contested additions, and that there was no admitted tax liability in this case. The impugned dismissal was set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication, subject to the assessee depositing Rs. 70,000 within one month and being granted adequate opportunity of hearing.
ITAT held that CIT(A) erred in invoking section 249(4)(b) to dismiss the assessee's appeals in limine on the ground of non-payment of advance tax computed on assessed income, including disputed additions. Relying on precedent, ITAT ruled that advance tax liability must be determined under sections 208 and 209 on admitted or undisputed income, not on contested additions, and that there was no admitted tax liability in this case. The impugned dismissal was set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication, subject to the assessee depositing Rs. 70,000 within one month and being granted adequate opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.