Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted penalty imposed u/s 271D for alleged violation of s. 269SS. The Tribunal found the impugned cash receipt formed part of the genuine sale consideration for land, was duly recorded in the books, immediately deposited in the bank, and fully disclosed to the tax authorities. There was no finding in the assessment or penalty orders that the transaction was not bona fide or that it was structured to evade tax. Holding that the cash was accepted under compulsion of the buyer at the time of registration, ITAT treated these circumstances as "reasonable cause" u/s 273B and held that penalty u/s 271D was not leviable.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted penalty imposed u/s 271D for alleged violation of s. 269SS. The Tribunal found the impugned cash receipt formed part of the genuine sale consideration for land, was duly recorded in the books, immediately deposited in the bank, and fully disclosed to the tax authorities. There was no finding in the assessment or penalty orders that the transaction was not bona fide or that it was structured to evade tax. Holding that the cash was accepted under compulsion of the buyer at the time of registration, ITAT treated these circumstances as "reasonable cause" u/s 273B and held that penalty u/s 271D was not leviable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.