Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT partly allowed the assessee's appeal in respect of addition for alleged bogus purchases treated as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C and taxed u/s 115BBE. While concurring that evidences of physical movement of goods were deficient, the Tribunal held that, given accepted corresponding sales and absence of rejection of books, only the profit element embedded in the disputed purchases could be taxed. Considering business nature, turnover and the assessee's concession, ITAT restricted the addition to 2% of the impugned purchases of Rs. 1,75,16,480/-, i.e., Rs. 3,50,330/-. It further held that such estimated profit does not fall under s.69C and is therefore taxable at normal rates, not u/s 115BBE.
ITAT partly allowed the assessee's appeal in respect of addition for alleged bogus purchases treated as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C and taxed u/s 115BBE. While concurring that evidences of physical movement of goods were deficient, the Tribunal held that, given accepted corresponding sales and absence of rejection of books, only the profit element embedded in the disputed purchases could be taxed. Considering business nature, turnover and the assessee's concession, ITAT restricted the addition to 2% of the impugned purchases of Rs. 1,75,16,480/-, i.e., Rs. 3,50,330/-. It further held that such estimated profit does not fall under s.69C and is therefore taxable at normal rates, not u/s 115BBE.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
