Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the addition of 5% of total sales consideration as estimated profit on alleged unexplained cash credits u/s 68 was unsustainable. It found that the CIT(A) had directed the AO to make this addition purely on presumptions and surmises, without any cogent basis or supporting material, despite confirmation of the transactions by the buyer in response to summons u/s 131 and production of evidences. Relying on the HC decision in a similar fact situation, ITAT set aside the part of the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the 5% addition, dismissed the revenue's appeal, and allowed the assessee's cross-objection.
ITAT held that the addition of 5% of total sales consideration as estimated profit on alleged unexplained cash credits u/s 68 was unsustainable. It found that the CIT(A) had directed the AO to make this addition purely on presumptions and surmises, without any cogent basis or supporting material, despite confirmation of the transactions by the buyer in response to summons u/s 131 and production of evidences. Relying on the HC decision in a similar fact situation, ITAT set aside the part of the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the 5% addition, dismissed the revenue's appeal, and allowed the assessee's cross-objection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.