Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal, holding the scrutiny assessment void ab initio due to an invalid notice under s.143(2) of the Income-tax Act. The notice, issued pursuant to computer-aided scrutiny selection, did not specify whether the case was taken up for limited scrutiny, complete scrutiny, or compulsory manual scrutiny, contrary to binding CBDT instructions. ITAT held that revenue authorities are mandatorily required to adhere to such instructions and that non-compliance vitiates the jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the impugned notice under s.143(2) and all consequential assessment proceedings were declared invalid, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal, holding the scrutiny assessment void ab initio due to an invalid notice under s.143(2) of the Income-tax Act. The notice, issued pursuant to computer-aided scrutiny selection, did not specify whether the case was taken up for limited scrutiny, complete scrutiny, or compulsory manual scrutiny, contrary to binding CBDT instructions. ITAT held that revenue authorities are mandatorily required to adhere to such instructions and that non-compliance vitiates the jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the impugned notice under s.143(2) and all consequential assessment proceedings were declared invalid, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.