Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
AAR held that amounts deposited by shippers into an escrow account operated by the applicant for onward remittance to carriers do not constitute "consideration" under Section 7 of the CGST Act, as the sums never accrue to the applicant and are held purely as deposits belonging to the transacting parties. The applicant's only taxable supply is its facilitation service as an intermediary, for which it receives subscription/commission, on which it is already discharging GST. Consequently, no GST is payable on the freight amounts handled through the escrow mechanism, which are outside the scope of supply in the applicant's hands.
AAR held that amounts deposited by shippers into an escrow account operated by the applicant for onward remittance to carriers do not constitute "consideration" under Section 7 of the CGST Act, as the sums never accrue to the applicant and are held purely as deposits belonging to the transacting parties. The applicant's only taxable supply is its facilitation service as an intermediary, for which it receives subscription/commission, on which it is already discharging GST. Consequently, no GST is payable on the freight amounts handled through the escrow mechanism, which are outside the scope of supply in the applicant's hands.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.