Tax authority's substitution of projected figures with actuals overturned; original acquisition valuation upheld; transfer pricing issues remitted for...
Beneficial owner held liable for differential customs duty; royalties added under Rule 10(1)(c); confiscation, penalties under s.111(m), s.114A, s.112...
AAR held that paddy qualifies as "agricultural produce" as it is derived from cultivation of plants and undergoes only such processing (dehusking) as is normally carried out by a cultivator, without altering its essential characteristics, merely rendering it marketable in the primary market. Consequently, paddy falls within the scope of "agricultural produce" under the relevant GST notification. Therefore, services by way of renting of a godown used exclusively for storage of paddy are covered under Entry 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), attracting Nil rate of GST, and such rental income is not liable to GST.
AAR held that paddy qualifies as "agricultural produce" as it is derived from cultivation of plants and undergoes only such processing (dehusking) as is normally carried out by a cultivator, without altering its essential characteristics, merely rendering it marketable in the primary market. Consequently, paddy falls within the scope of "agricultural produce" under the relevant GST notification. Therefore, services by way of renting of a godown used exclusively for storage of paddy are covered under Entry 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), attracting Nil rate of GST, and such rental income is not liable to GST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
