Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee-trust's appeal and deleted the addition made u/s 69C. The Tribunal held that the addition was based solely on third-party statements recorded during search, without any seized material, bank trail, or corroborative evidence establishing that the donation was returned in cash after commission. The assessee was not confronted with such statements despite specific request, vitiating reliance on them. ITAT reiterated that uncorroborated search statements and mere suspicion cannot substitute legal proof. As the donation was made through banking channels to a registered charitable trust holding valid s.12A and s.80G registrations, and duly recorded in books, the assessee had discharged its onus. Section 69C was held inapplicable and the inter-trust donation treated as valid application of income u/s 11.
ITAT allowed the assessee-trust's appeal and deleted the addition made u/s 69C. The Tribunal held that the addition was based solely on third-party statements recorded during search, without any seized material, bank trail, or corroborative evidence establishing that the donation was returned in cash after commission. The assessee was not confronted with such statements despite specific request, vitiating reliance on them. ITAT reiterated that uncorroborated search statements and mere suspicion cannot substitute legal proof. As the donation was made through banking channels to a registered charitable trust holding valid s.12A and s.80G registrations, and duly recorded in books, the assessee had discharged its onus. Section 69C was held inapplicable and the inter-trust donation treated as valid application of income u/s 11.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.