Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order allowing Assessee's deductions while computing LTCG on sale of encumbered immovable property. It rejected AO's view that Rs. 2 crore paid to a society to resolve rival ownership claims was a gratuitous payment, holding it to be expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer, deductible under s.48(i). ITAT further held that amounts directly paid by purchasers to SBI and Axis Bank for discharge of mortgage under SARFAESI constituted diversion of income by overriding title and never accrued to Assessee; such sums were correctly excluded from sale consideration. Revenue's appeal was dismissed in entirety.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order allowing Assessee's deductions while computing LTCG on sale of encumbered immovable property. It rejected AO's view that Rs. 2 crore paid to a society to resolve rival ownership claims was a gratuitous payment, holding it to be expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer, deductible under s.48(i). ITAT further held that amounts directly paid by purchasers to SBI and Axis Bank for discharge of mortgage under SARFAESI constituted diversion of income by overriding title and never accrued to Assessee; such sums were correctly excluded from sale consideration. Revenue's appeal was dismissed in entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.