Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order allowing Assessee's deductions while computing LTCG on sale of encumbered immovable property. It rejected AO's view that Rs. 2 crore paid to a society to resolve rival ownership claims was a gratuitous payment, holding it to be expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer, deductible under s.48(i). ITAT further held that amounts directly paid by purchasers to SBI and Axis Bank for discharge of mortgage under SARFAESI constituted diversion of income by overriding title and never accrued to Assessee; such sums were correctly excluded from sale consideration. Revenue's appeal was dismissed in entirety.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order allowing Assessee's deductions while computing LTCG on sale of encumbered immovable property. It rejected AO's view that Rs. 2 crore paid to a society to resolve rival ownership claims was a gratuitous payment, holding it to be expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer, deductible under s.48(i). ITAT further held that amounts directly paid by purchasers to SBI and Axis Bank for discharge of mortgage under SARFAESI constituted diversion of income by overriding title and never accrued to Assessee; such sums were correctly excluded from sale consideration. Revenue's appeal was dismissed in entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.