Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that Zinc-EDTA (EDTA Zinc 12%) is classifiable under CTI 3105 9090 as "other fertilizers" and not under CTI 2922 4990 as proposed by the Department. The Tribunal emphasized that classification is directly linked to chargeability and the burden of proof rests on Revenue when seeking a heading different from that declared by the importer. As no representative samples were tested and the expert opinion relied on by Revenue was based on secondary internet material rather than actual test reports, the Department failed to discharge this burden. Noting the deliberate presence of nitrogen and application of Chapter 31 Note 6, CESTAT set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeal.
CESTAT held that Zinc-EDTA (EDTA Zinc 12%) is classifiable under CTI 3105 9090 as "other fertilizers" and not under CTI 2922 4990 as proposed by the Department. The Tribunal emphasized that classification is directly linked to chargeability and the burden of proof rests on Revenue when seeking a heading different from that declared by the importer. As no representative samples were tested and the expert opinion relied on by Revenue was based on secondary internet material rather than actual test reports, the Department failed to discharge this burden. Noting the deliberate presence of nitrogen and application of Chapter 31 Note 6, CESTAT set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
