Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable on the ground of availability of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner's challenge to the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice and Order-in-Original as time-barred, and to the invocation of the extended limitation under Section 73, was held to be a matter within the jurisdiction of the appellate authority, not warranting HC interference under Article 226. The Court declined to adjudicate on "suppression of facts" or validity of extended limitation. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to file an appeal, with a direction that time spent in the writ proceedings be excluded for limitation purposes.
HC dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable on the ground of availability of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner's challenge to the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice and Order-in-Original as time-barred, and to the invocation of the extended limitation under Section 73, was held to be a matter within the jurisdiction of the appellate authority, not warranting HC interference under Article 226. The Court declined to adjudicate on "suppression of facts" or validity of extended limitation. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to file an appeal, with a direction that time spent in the writ proceedings be excluded for limitation purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
