Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) on miscellaneous expenses, sales promotion expenses and incentives. It held that the AO had proceeded on mere presumptions that TDS u/s 194J was applicable, without identifying specific payments on which tax was not deducted. The Tribunal noted absence of any adverse remark in the tax audit report and found that the assessee had furnished complete details and had deducted TDS wherever applicable. Consequently, the order of the CIT(A) sustaining 30% disallowance was set aside.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) on miscellaneous expenses, sales promotion expenses and incentives. It held that the AO had proceeded on mere presumptions that TDS u/s 194J was applicable, without identifying specific payments on which tax was not deducted. The Tribunal noted absence of any adverse remark in the tax audit report and found that the assessee had furnished complete details and had deducted TDS wherever applicable. Consequently, the order of the CIT(A) sustaining 30% disallowance was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.