Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC examined a challenge to a SCN and order u/s 74 of the CGST Act concerning GST liability on assignment of leasehold rights over industrial land originally allotted by a state industrial corporation. Relying on its earlier precedents, HC held that assignment/sale/transfer of leasehold rights in such plots constitutes transfer of benefits arising from immovable property, not a "supply" of services u/s 7(1)(a), nor covered by Schedule II or III so as to attract GST u/s 9. Consequently, the impugned order dated 15.09.2025 was quashed and the petition allowed.
HC examined a challenge to a SCN and order u/s 74 of the CGST Act concerning GST liability on assignment of leasehold rights over industrial land originally allotted by a state industrial corporation. Relying on its earlier precedents, HC held that assignment/sale/transfer of leasehold rights in such plots constitutes transfer of benefits arising from immovable property, not a "supply" of services u/s 7(1)(a), nor covered by Schedule II or III so as to attract GST u/s 9. Consequently, the impugned order dated 15.09.2025 was quashed and the petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
