Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC examined a challenge to a SCN and order u/s 74 of the CGST Act concerning GST liability on assignment of leasehold rights over industrial land originally allotted by a state industrial corporation. Relying on its earlier precedents, HC held that assignment/sale/transfer of leasehold rights in such plots constitutes transfer of benefits arising from immovable property, not a "supply" of services u/s 7(1)(a), nor covered by Schedule II or III so as to attract GST u/s 9. Consequently, the impugned order dated 15.09.2025 was quashed and the petition allowed.
HC examined a challenge to a SCN and order u/s 74 of the CGST Act concerning GST liability on assignment of leasehold rights over industrial land originally allotted by a state industrial corporation. Relying on its earlier precedents, HC held that assignment/sale/transfer of leasehold rights in such plots constitutes transfer of benefits arising from immovable property, not a "supply" of services u/s 7(1)(a), nor covered by Schedule II or III so as to attract GST u/s 9. Consequently, the impugned order dated 15.09.2025 was quashed and the petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
